Playing meme frequently suffered Waterloo, CZ fell into the dilemma of "too many words and many mistakes"

Author: flowie, ChainCatcher

CZ seems to be very wronged. Why did a tweet he reposted casually cause such a big controversy?

Crypto users don’t understand why CZ, which has nearly 100 million followers, took the risk of forwarding tweets suspected of fraudulent coins, even confusing many users, “CZ must have been stolen.”

Some community users joked that the two most powerful men who have been encrypted recently have been schizophrenia. In addition to Trump, who shouts "The big one is coming" every day, there is also CZ who always says "I don't know, I don't understand, I'm not me..."

As one of the largest Chinese leaders in Encryption and known as "cousin", the rift between CZ and community users seems to be gradually emerging. He often suffered Waterloo when playing meme, and intentionally or unintentionally endorsing the controversial project, CZ fell into a dilemma of saying too much and making mistakes. ********

Playing meme frequently gets Waterloo

CZ is uploading meme again.

Following the pet dog meme farce and meme experimental coin TST controversy, yesterday afternoon, CZ forwarded the comments to the celebrity meme coin, which made him get into a lot of trouble again.

Recommended reading " The Meme's annual farce caused by CZ pet dogs ended with scolding"; " A full review of TST events: Community carnival to Binance controversy, a microcosm of the crypto market "

CZ retweeted and commented on football star Ronaldinho's tweet promoting token STAR10 and emphasized that this is a token exclusively released on BNB Chain, and He Yi later retweeted the tweet.

Perhaps due to comments and reposts from CZ and Lianchuang Heyi, the token's market value quickly exceeded US$350 million from US$200 million.

But less than an hour later, some community users were immersed in the new wealth password endorsed by CZ, and the token was revealed by X user @R10coin_, which was suspected to be a Shenzhen "Plate" coin. It was a token promoted by Ronaldinho after selling his X account to the Shenzhen "Coin Issuing" team for US$5 million.

Blockchain security company GoPlus Security also issued a user security reminder, saying that STAR10 has serious security risks and that the owner can destroy any holder token.

Although the tweets forwarded by CZ have clearly stated that there is no endorsement, which makes users wary of risks, community users do not seem to buy into CZ's disclaimer.

A Twitter user commented that you should not pretend to be innocent by adding "this is not an endorsement". In the final analysis, you want to bring more transaction volume back to BNB Chain, but you don't consider these celebrities (coins) at all, so it will soon lose all your money.

What makes many crypto users even more confused is why CZ does not have the ability to identify a token that is obviously suspected of fraud?

Ronaldinho has a bad personal record and has always had a bad reputation in business. He has repeatedly "making money" without bottom line through football training, business platforms and other methods around the world. Before CZ forwarded the comment, Twitter user @gokunocool also revealed that Ronaldini was suspected of conspiring with the Shenzhen team to promote tokens.

CZ's approach to promoting BNB Chain's growth through celebrity coins and other memes has also been questioned.

KOL@huahuayjy, an encrypted ecology focused on the BNB Chain ecosystem, advised that Solana's (recently) decline started with the issuance of coins by various celebrities. The issuance of coins by celebrities in the cabal cannot bring users to BNB Chain, and it will also harm BNB Chain. I hope CZ will still support BNB Chain native projects more.

After the public opinion fermented, CZ seemed to be a little confused or even wronged, and his remarks that attributed the controversy to "cultural differences" added fuel to the fire.

CZ even suggested, "Why don't you send Chinese in the future?", encrypted KOL@thankUcrypto refuted that this is completely an attribution error. It should have been a mistake in forwarding this action to allow the fraud disk to obtain traffic, but it is wrong to blame the language and culture differences.

CZ also offended Chinese users unconsciously, and Chinese community users said bluntly, "Don't forget that Binance is supported by Chinese users."

More words and more mistakes, CZ is in distress

CZ's recent speeches or measures have also frequently caused controversy. To summarize, it will focus on three aspects:

• Endorsement for controversial projects: In addition to yesterday’s tweet for Ronaldinho celebrity currency, CZ also endorsed the controversial blockchain security company Certik at the end of last year.
• The sudden "experiment" caused dissatisfaction among players: broccoli pet dog meme has aroused appetite, TST test coins have been put into the currency and smashed the market; the new token issuance mechanism is expected to be "treated but not cured" or even outdated;
• Some low-level errors or confusing operations: mistakenly believed that BNB on Hashkey Global is a BNB recognized by Hong Kong; it is said that it has only used DEX for the first time recently.

Perhaps the overall market is declining, as well as Binance's wealth effect on exchanges and chains, have made community users exaggerate CZ's "out of state" to a certain extent.

However, it continues to cause dissatisfaction among community users, and CZ may really have to ruminate on the problems in its grievances.

Regarding the dilemma of CZ's recent efforts but failures on meme, KOL@ Sea_Bitcoin analyzed that in the final analysis, it was just to use meme to divert traffic to BNB Chain. It was too utilitarian in the short term and its actions were deformed. ”

Bingfrog believes that this is a disconnection of cognition and does not understand the logic of the community. In his opinion, CZ is like the idea of ​​nearly 500 powerful corporate executives in Web2, and is often accustomed to completely cutting out factual statements and value judgments, believing that forwarding news does not represent a position.

"But the logic of the community is a language under decentralized traffic logic. For example, silence is acquiescence, voice is a platform, and negation is equivalent to disguised authentication."

CZ's frequent "absent" may also expose the information cocoon caused by the "big company disease". The most controversial thing today is probably this tweet that highly supports CZ, which makes the originally conflicts more intense.

@Btman_Jeff and other Twitter users even criticized CZ for not having censors around it, resulting in information deviation.

And how to truly embrace the market and the city?

As early as a month ago, Crypto KOL Yuyue also provided advice for CZ, that is, compared to gaining cognition from employees around you, it is better to have 4-5 conference calls with top players in the market every month to get real cognition from the forefront of the market.