Web3 VC Ultimate Guide, Which VC can you make money by playing with?

Reprinted from chaincatcher
03/02/2025·2MAuthor: Seige (@EvanCrypto17)
It takes 48 hours to organize it, a must-see data collection for Web3 players.
In Web3 so many VCs
Which VCs have the best vision? Which VCs invest in projects have the highest yield? Which VCs do ordinary players have to invest together in the early stage and make it more cost-effective? Which item to choose for masturbation? What are the VCs at home and abroad? Is the projects invested in by foreign VCs greater?
All the issues we retail investors are most concerned about, and they are also what players (hair-beating party) want to pay attention to the most.
In this article, we use the most intuitive data to speak and expose the answers to these questions one by one.
All data are disclosed online. We screened 65 VCs in total, including 23 foreign VCs, 34 domestic VCs, and 8 VCs under the exchange.
The result is the best result of VC investment is that the token has entered a large office.
Although we know that some projects are profitable without issuing coins, this is not a game that ordinary players can enter.
Therefore, we give the following dimensions as judgment:
quantity:
VC Total investment transactions - Number of coins issued by projects - Number of Binance on projects - Number of OKX on projects - Number of Coinbase on projects
Success rate:
Project Binance Rate = Binance Number/Total Number of Investments - Project Ouyi Rate = OKX Number/Total Number of Investments - Project Coinbase Rate = Coinbase Number/Total Number of Investments
Judgment conditions:
Comprehensive score = 2 * Binance rate + 1 * Ouyi rate + 1 * Coinbase rate
Binance is the largest, so the weight is 2
Average rate of return on the project (ROI) = 15 * Binance rate + 10 * Ouyi rate + 10 * Coinbase rate
ROI was made an average of 15 times in the previous period, and ROI made an average of 10 times in the average of 10 times in the previous period. The average of ROI made an average of 10 times in the previous period of investment. Assuming that each item is different, the average value is taken here.
Let 's talk about the conclusion first
According to the gap in comprehensive scores, we divide VCs into five levels: T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4. The higher the ranking, the better the VC's vision. We follow these VCs and invest our energy in the primary market and make it more cost-effective.
VC Level:
T0 level VCs include YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), Continue Captial, IOSG Ventures, and Bain Capital
T1 level VCs include Multicoin, Pantera, 1Confirmation, Smrti Lab, Zonff Partners
T2-level VCs include Polychain, ParaFi Capital, Dragonfly, Sequoia China, Delphi Digital, Electric Capital, Mint Ventures, CoinFund
T3 level VCs include Framework Ventures, NGC Ventures, SNZ Holding, Coinbase Ventures, OKX Ventures, etc.
T4-level VCs include Animoca Brands, GSR, Hashkey Capital, Waterdrip, LD Capital, etc.
Regional VC investment output and income ranking:
Foreign VC > Exchange-owned VC > Domestic VC
T0 level VC
T0 level VCs include YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), Continue Captial, IOSG Ventures, and Bain Capital
The comprehensive score is >1, the average ROI is between 8 and 12, and we invest our energy in these VCs in the early stage of the project, and we can basically get big results. The probability of making money with single coin A7 A8 is very high.
Detailed data are shown in the figure
T1 level VC
T1 level VCs include Multicoin, Pantera, 1Confirmation, Smrti Lab, Zonff Partners
The comprehensive score is between 0.7 and 1, and the average ROI is between 6 and 7.5. We invested our efforts in these VCs' early investment projects, and the returns were also very good, and A6.5 was also a good result.
Detailed data are shown in the figure
T2 level VC
T2-level VCs include Polychain, ParaFi Capital, Dragonfly, Sequoia China, Delphi Digital, Electric Capital, Mint Ventures, CoinFund
Comprehensive scores between 0.5 - 0.7, with an average ROI between 4 - 6, we invested our efforts in these VCs' early investment projects, and the returns were a bit unstable, but try it might have a chance
Detailed data are shown in the figure
T3 level VC
T3 level VCs include Framework Ventures, NGC Ventures, SNZ Holding, Coinbase Ventures, OKX Ventures, etc.
The combined score is 0.3 - 0.5, and the average ROI is 2.5 - 4.5. We invested our efforts in these VCs' early investment projects, and the returns are a bit unstable and the rate of return is not high.
Detailed data are shown in the figure
T4 level VC
T4-level VCs include Animoca Brands, GSR, Hashkey Capital, Waterdrip, LD Capital, etc.
The combined score is at an average ROI of 0 - 0.3 and an average ROI of 0 -2.5. We invest our efforts in these VCs in the early stage of investment, and the returns are not optimistic and the probability is small.
Detailed data are shown in the figure
Also attached with Easter eggs
The probability of Binance and Ouyi investing in projects is higher
The probability of "Three Royal Companies" in the projects invested by Coinbase is similar
Let's summarize
Based on the data, we found that VCs that are usually heard of are very powerful, such as a16z, Coinbase, Dragonfly, Polychain, etc., actually have no reference value for ordinary people.
The "VC sign" played by some projects may be "scavenge" ordinary players.
In fact, in our analysis, the projects that VCs at levels T0 and T1 are what we should really pay attention to and invest in.
The output of foreign VCs is higher than that of domestic VCs, and the output of VC investment under the exchange ranks between the two.
When considering whether a project is worth the initial investment, we will see which levels the participating VCs are corresponding to, and comprehensively judge the listed data, which is of great reference value for us to compete in the primary market.
Again, this article only discusses the output ratio of ordinary players to follow the VC input and ranks accordingly. It does not involve the comprehensive strength and other aspects of the companies and brands represented by VCs!