Observation on the political attributes of crypto assets behind helping Trump take office

Author: Revc

As an emerging financial instrument, the political attributes of cryptoassets must be analyzed within the historical context. In the past 75 years of global history, interest groups after World War II often ignored the importance of civil rights and personal wealth in order to maintain the continuity and legitimacy of their own rule. This phenomenon has been reflected in many global political events, and the emergence of cryptoassets can be seen as a challenge to this state of affairs. They provide a decentralized way to store and trade wealth, which in theory can reduce the possibility of personal wealth being controlled by a central authority. One of the original design goals of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies was to create a financial system that did not rely on a central banking system, thereby reducing the government's ability to directly intervene in the economy.

Furthermore, the global and border-agnostic nature of crypto-assets offers a potential tool that can help bypass economic sanctions and financial controls driven by power politics. For example, in some countries with severe economic sanctions, citizens may turn to cryptocurrencies to maintain continuity and privacy in their financial activities.

However, cryptoassets are not without controversy. The extreme volatility of its value and regulatory uncertainty have called it into question as a stable method of asset storage. Cryptoassets may be used for illegal transactions due to their anonymous nature, which increases the difficulty of government supervision and makes the integration of cryptocurrencies into the traditional financial system challenging.

When considering the future development of crypto assets, it is important to realize that this is not only a matter of technological progress, but also a reflection of changes in the global political and economic structure. As technology develops and political dynamics change, cryptoassets are likely to play an increasingly important role in the global economy, especially in improving financial inclusion and protecting asset security. And it is realized through party games such as this US election.

**Trump and the American Red Neck Group: The Disjunction between

Globalization and Grassroots Interests and Legal Challenges**

Trump's loyal supporters, especially the "red-neck" group in the United States, have long felt ignored by the American elite. In the implementation of the globalization strategy, these grassroots people have paid a huge price for US globalization and military intervention, but their interests have not been correspondingly rewarded.

The plight of American rednecks and the conflict with globalization

The term "redneck" generally refers to the white, working-class people of the southern and rural areas of the United States. Although the term has a derogatory connotation, many people also regard it as a status symbol. Rednecks often hold conservative views, are suspicious of government and elites, and are averse to globalization and multiculturalism. They usually face problems such as low education levels, limited employment opportunities, and insufficient social welfare. They live in the fluctuations of the global economy, but fail to obtain sufficient benefits from globalization.

The United States' overseas strategy, including military intervention, foreign policy, and economic sanctions, aims to maintain or expand the United States' global influence. However, from the perspective of the redneck community, these strategies are more about supporting the interests of the elite than the grassroots. Multinational companies such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook, as well as military-industrial enterprises such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing, have gained huge market shares and huge profits with the help of the United States' global strategy. These strategies further marginalize rednecks by providing substantial returns to elites by expanding global markets, collecting data, and promoting military needs.

The disconnect between red neck groups and globalization strategies

For these groups, America's overseas strategy means that the rewards in exchange for their taxes and loved ones who may have sacrificed for the country, such as those serving in the military, do not flow directly into their communities. Instead, what they saw was the closure of local factories, the outflow of job opportunities, and the skewing of resources. Resources in domestic infrastructure, education, medical care and other fields should be used to improve people's livelihood, but were allocated to projects that support global strategies. . This disconnect of interests has caused red- neck groups to distrust government policies and develop a strong aversion to globalization and internationalism, thereby supporting populist and protectionist policies, especially Trump’s “ America First ” policy.

Trump 's legal challenges and political battles

At the same time, Trump is facing a series of legal challenges involving multiple fields, including hush money cases, confidential document cases, election interference cases, etc. These cases not only have a major impact on Trump's personal and political life, but also have a profound impact on the legal and political landscape of the United States. In these cases, Trump has tried to delay the legal process and buy more time through defensive strategies such as delaying trials, challenging presidential immunity, and shaping public opinion.

Background and political implications of the case

These cases have been widely interpreted as a political persecution of Trump and have become part of the political opposition in the United States. Republicans see the cases as an attempt by Democrats to weaken Trump's political power, while Democrats see them as necessary accountability for Trump's misconduct. These cases not only test the boundaries of presidential immunity but may also set legal precedents for future presidential responsibilities, impact public trust in the rule of law, and shape voters' political attitudes.

Trump's legal battle not only affects his personal fate, but also sets the stage for how future presidents and high-profile politicians will be held legally accountable. How these cases are handled will directly affect public trust in the judicial system and have a profound impact on future elections. At the same time, these cases also provide new models for how to balance politics and law, shaping the public's legal expectations for the behavior of politicians.

**Trump and the polarization of American politics: Legal disputes,

partisan loyalties and cultural clashes**

Donald Trump's political career and the legal challenges he faces reveal the complex interactions between American society, culture, politics and human nature. His case highlights the depth of political polarization and American society's tolerance for legal and moral controversy, especially when shaped by partisan loyalties and cultural media. The rift between Trump’s supporters and opponents also provides an important perspective for us to understand the current political and social dynamics in the United States.

Political polarization and partisan loyalty

Trump's legal and moral controversies epitomize the polarization of American politics. Amid these controversies, the Republican base has tended to view Trump's legal battles as attacks by political opponents rather than real legal or ethical issues. This reflects the powerful role of partisan loyalty, which often trumps individual actions or legal consequences in highly polarized political environments. For Trump's supporters, no matter how much controversy he faces, partisan loyalty leads them to view these issues as extensions of political maneuvering rather than necessary legal and moral examinations.

Culture and Media Influence

With the rise of partisan media, the public’s view is increasingly limited to the news sources they identify with, creating an echo chamber effect. In this environment, Trump's scandals have been downplayed or interpreted as political revenge by some media, which has led many supporters to turn a blind eye to his personal problems and even view his anti-establishment image as a rebellion out of touch with traditional politics. . Trump's success has attracted voters disillusioned with traditional politics, a group that has tended to ignore Trump's personal and legal problems and instead focus on the political change he represents.

Empathy and Legal Norms

Trump’s supporters have broad empathy for his status as a “ political outsider ” and the “ injustice ” he feels , an emotion that goes beyond a focus on legal norms. In American society, the public often adopts flexible legal interpretations of the actions of political figures, especially when these figures serve their cultural or economic interests. This tolerance may lead to a looser interpretation of Trump 's actions and reflect the complex balance between emotional identification and legal regulations among some American voters.

Trump’s re-election and social impact

Trump’s re-election is a testament to society’s tolerance for change and redemption. Trump 's political journey has challenged traditional notions of leadership and demonstrated that even a controversial figure can succeed in America's democratic system. Trump's re-election is more than just a personal victory. It symbolizes the inclusivity of the American political system and shows that even when there are huge differences, society is still able to choose leaders through the democratic process.

Tom Hanks, Obama and Ideological Reflections

Culturally influential public figures such as Tom Hanks and Barack Obama have often criticized Trump's leadership style, which emphasizes the values ​​of etiquette, morality and traditional leadership. These contrasts reveal deep ideological differences between liberalism and conservatism. Liberals may not fully understand the sentiments of Trump supporters, and Trump’s success reflects many people’s critique of elitism and alienation from liberal cultural icons.

Inclusive political system and social balance

The American political system allows for the expression of a wide range of political ideologies through its inclusiveness, which is also an important force for social stability. Trump 's re-election may be seen as a symbol of the health of this political system - even controversial leaders can be elected through democratic processes, showing that the political system can still maintain a basic social order even in the midst of turmoil. However, this inclusion also brings challenges, particularly in terms of weakening democratic norms and social cohesion, potentially exacerbating the divisions in American society.

These complex political, cultural and legal dynamics have profoundly affected Trump's political career and shaped his long-term influence in American society, not only at the political level, but also deeply rooted in all aspects of culture and society.

**Trump 's Inauguration Speech: Reshaping Government, Regulation and

Democratic Rights**

Trump's inaugural address featured a series of themes centered around governance, justice and social values, highlighting his commitment to reinventing and restoring the U.S. system of government. The following are core ideas related to "regulation, privacy, justice and democratic rights":

Judiciary and Government Reform

Trump has pledged to end the weaponization of the Justice Department and government agencies, arguing they have been used in the past to target perceived injustice or corruption. The goals he proposed were to rebalance justice and return to fair government practices, eliminate abuse of power, and ensure judicial independence and administrative transparency.

democratic rights

Trump emphasized returning faith, wealth, democracy and freedom to the people, promising to restore citizens ' rights and voices by moving to more democratic governance. He said he would give priority to the people's demands, promote a more democratic political environment, and ensure that the government responds to public needs.

Regulatory and Privacy Issues

Although specific policies were not detailed in the speech, it can be inferred from its context that Trump intends to restructure the current regulatory system, especially in terms of national security and border control. This change may be achieved by declaring a national emergency and adjusting immigration laws to re-examine policies that may affect privacy and ensure that regulations balance the national interest with the privacy of citizens.

Rebuilding trust and transparency in government

Trump acknowledged the current crisis of confidence in the government and expressed his intention to restore the integrity and competency of the administration. He pledged to take measures to increase government transparency, ensure public trust in government institutions is restored, and strengthen government accountability.

Overall, Trump's speech reflected an intention to significantly change policy and government approaches, reexamining the balance of regulation, privacy, and judicial and democratic rights to better align with the values ​​and needs of the people. Such reforms aim to restore public trust in government while protecting individual rights and freedoms.

**The combination of Trump and crypto assets: a multi-dimensional

interpretation of historical background and political game**

Trump’s relationship with cryptoassets reflects complex interactions at broader historical, economic and social levels. The following analysis is divided into key sections and explores the context and influencing factors:

The historical background of major Japanese and Korean companies

Large Japanese companies: From military expansion in World War II to postwar transformation, large Japanese companies such as Mitsubishi and Sumitomo emerged through government connections and post-war economic opportunities and became modern, diversified enterprises.

Major South Korean companies: South Korea’s economic miracle, especially the rise of Samsung and Hyundai, is due to the economic development policies and international aid promoted by the government, which helped the country move from post-war poverty to an economic power.

“The Lost 20 Years” and the Plight of Young People

Japan’s “Lost 20 Years”: Since the 1990s, Japan has experienced two decades of economic stagnation. Young people have faced employment difficulties, social mobility has declined, and a large number of “vagrants” and “otakus” have emerged. .

South Korea’s challenges: Although South Korea does not have a similar “lost 20 years,” young people have also faced high unemployment, soaring housing prices and deteriorating working conditions in recent years, especially in an economy dominated by big companies.

Postwar Interest Groups and Civil Rights Issues

• Influence of stakeholder groups: After the war, large companies in Japan and South Korea formed a strong economic and political influence, safeguarding their own interests through close relationships with the government, which sometimes may be at the expense of democratic processes or public interests.

• Civil Rights and Wealth Inequality: While the economic models of Japan and South Korea promote national economic growth, they also exacerbate social inequality, especially in terms of workers' rights and income distribution.

The Threat of World War III and Global Politics

• Global political context: Although there is no evidence that global power groups deliberately used the threat of World War III to manipulate the situation, the geopolitical tensions of the Cold War and post-Cold War did provide some countries with an excuse to strengthen unity in their domestic affairs.

• Economic and political interests: Post-globalization economic policies tend to favor rich countries and multinational corporations, and the needs and civil rights issues of developing countries may be ignored.

Problems between the US military-industrial complex, the establishment and multinational Internet companies

• Military-industrial companies: Lockheed Martin, Boeing and other military-industrial companies in the United States make huge profits through government contracts and occupy a prominent position in national defense policy. This concentration of power leads to expansionist military policies and neglect of diplomatic solutions, which in turn affects domestic social spending.

• The influence of the establishment: The establishment usually represents vested interest groups, and the concentration of power may lead to policies that are biased to protect the interests of these groups rather than the broad interests of the people, weakening the effectiveness of democracy.

• Multinational Internet companies: Technology giants such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook have been criticized for market monopoly and privacy issues, especially in terms of the balance between data collection, content moderation, and free speech.

The Role of the Democratic Party and Political Game

• Policy and reform: The Democratic Party has promoted the regulation of military industrial enterprises and multinational Internet companies in some areas, but it also faces pressure from inside and outside the party and must find a balance between promoting social justice, economic development and maintaining competitiveness.

• Splits within the party and external challenges: The struggle between progressive factions and establishment factions within the Democratic Party and changes in the external political environment continue to affect the intensity and direction of policy implementation within the party.

The combination of Trump and crypto assets

• The intersection of politics and economics: Trump’s supporters, including some working class people in traditional industries, feel the alienation of modern political elites and the injustice brought about by the globalized economy. Therefore, Trump has turned to crypto assets as an anti-establishment tool, winning over many voters who are disillusioned with the existing system, especially in their distrust of the traditional financial system.

• Redistribution of wealth and power: Cryptocurrency assets provide Trump with a platform to challenge traditional financial and political elites, emphasizing the political slogan of confronting " Wall Street " and the " establishment " , which is both culturally symbolic and trying to promote New economic model.

To sum up, the combination of Trump and crypto assets is a multi-layered political phenomenon. It is not only related to the global historical background and the unequal distribution of the economic system, but also to the relationship between interest groups, military industrial enterprises and technology giants in American politics. Power struggles are closely related. The role played by the Democratic Party in this process is complex and full of games, including attempts to promote reforms and pressure to maintain the status quo.

Reasons why the Democratic Party lost votes: The deep connection between history, system and class struggle

Behind the Democratic Party 's loss of votes lies the class system in American history, the continuation of the postwar political system, and the contradiction between civil rights and the interests of the working class. The following analysis of multi-dimensional factors related to the families of past presidents, the experience of World War II, and U.S. global hegemony reveals the roots of the Democratic Party's current political predicament.

Presidential family ties to World War II

• Franklin D. Roosevelt: During World War II, Roosevelt, as President of the United States, led important wartime decisions and promoted historic policies such as Lend-Lease and the founding of the United Nations, which laid the foundation for the shape of the postwar world.

• John F. Kennedy: During World War II, Kennedy served in the U.S. Navy and experienced the Pacific Theater, which became an important part of his political career.

• Barack Obama and Joe Biden: The family backgrounds of the two presidents are indirectly related to World War II. Although their immediate family members did not directly serve in the military, their families ' wartime experiences became an important part of their personal political narratives. Obama demonstrated his understanding of American history and military sacrifice by referring to his grandfather's World War II experience, while Biden reinforced his sympathy for the struggles of the American middle class by describing his father's life difficulties during the Great Depression and World War II.

The relationship between the Democratic Party and the existing political system

The Democratic Party prefers to maintain the current dollar system and existing political structures, especially since there are many senior figures in the party who have gained support and success through the existing system. The background of these leaders in the party makes the Democratic Party appear more conservative in policy implementation and find it difficult to break through the traditional framework. These leaders usually came from higher classes and represented interests based on the postwar system.

The connection between global hegemony and Middle East interests

The United States ' global hegemony, especially its policy of seeking interests in the Middle East, has led to turmoil in Middle Eastern countries and nations, and indirectly contributed to the occurrence of the 9/11 incident. This incident has greatly affected the domestic judicial system in the United States, enhanced government surveillance and control, and sacrificed civil rights. As a supporter of globalization, the Democratic Party, while safeguarding global interests, has failed to effectively protect the economic interests of the domestic people, especially the working class who rely on traditional industries and energy.

The influence of the post-war establishment

The post-war establishment still firmly controls American institutions and ideas, and it is through this system that some leaders within the Democratic Party have achieved political success. However, as times change, the constraints of this system have become increasingly apparent. The Democratic Party's failure to effectively address civil rights issues, especially its neglect of energy industry workers and low-income groups in the Rust Belt, has alienated this segment of voters from the Democratic Party. Turning to other political forces, especially under the influence of anti-establishment figures like Trump.

There are many reasons why the Democratic Party lost votes, including its deep connection with the historical class system, its reliance on the existing political and economic system, and its neglect of traditional working class interests. The political elite background during World War II and the continuation of the post-war system made the Democratic Party often remain conservative in its policies and found it difficult to respond to the growing needs of the people. Ultimately, this series of factors led to the gradual loss of the Democratic Party's voter base.

The Intersection of Decentralization and Civil Rights: Rethinking Cryptocurrency, Freedom, and Social Structure

The rise of cryptocurrencies and blockchain is deeply connected to the core ideals of civil rights. The following analysis explores how decentralization aligns with civil rights issues such as privacy protection, financial inclusion, censorship resistance, and democratic decentralization, and how this idea has an impact in current social and political structures.

Reducing Government Control: Protecting Privacy and Freedom

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin reduce government or central bank intervention through a decentralized network, in line with the demands of the civil rights movement for personal privacy protection and reduced government control. The operation of cryptocurrency allows individuals to conduct economic activities freely without worrying about government surveillance or manipulation of monetary policy, safeguarding economic freedom and privacy rights.

Financial Inclusion: Accessible Financial Services

Decentralized finance (DeFi) provides new avenues for financial transactions for those who have been ignored or excluded in the traditional banking system, such as the unbanked. This is in line with the demands for economic rights in the civil rights movement, allowing more people to participate in the global economy and improving social and economic inclusion.

Censorship Resistance: Free Speech and Resistance to Oppression

Blockchain technology makes fund transfers less susceptible to censorship or freezing, which is particularly important in situations of political repression or economic sanctions. Decentralized financial systems support the need for free expression and resistance to political oppression, further connecting with the core values ​​of civil rights for free expression and resistance to oppression.

Decentralization of power: democracy and autonomy

Decentralization means that no single entity can control the entire network, thus helping to promote a more democratic economic system and reduce the concentration of power. Decentralization supports the concept of balance of power in civil rights and promotes a more equitable and autonomous economic environment.

The political attributes of cryptoassets and the current status of global society

Decentralization is closely related to individual development rights. It reflects an idea that opposes the dominance of post-war interest groups and reshapes the economic and social structure. After World War II, in order to maintain the survival and legitimacy of rule, interest groups ignored civil rights and personal wealth, and set standards in all aspects of society that only served GDP , leading to the degradation of social functions and the alienation of the working class. This process has similarities to the results of the " Rat Utopia " experiment.

The ' rat utopia ' experiment: a metaphor for the collapse of social structures

Experimental background and design: John Calhoun’s “Rat Utopia” experiments in the 1960s and 1970s simulated a “perfect” environment that provided unlimited food and water, but space became a limiting factor.

Experimental results: As the number of rats increases, the social structure collapses, and problems such as violence, abnormal sexual behavior (gender ambiguity), and decreased reproductive rates (decreased fertility) occur, eventually leading to the collapse of the rat group and the complete disintegration of social functions. The "beautiful rats" in the experiment represent individualism and self-isolation in society, showing indifference to collective responsibility, leading to the degradation of society as a whole, but this is caused by the operating mechanism of the social environment in which the rats live.

Manifestations of degradation of social functions: Violence, sexual disorder, loss of maternal behavior and other phenomena occurred in the experiment, reflecting the collapse of the social structure and the extremity of individual behavior.

The current state of global society and the warning of “rat utopia”

This experiment warns of the link between excessive population density, artificially regulated limits on resources, and the collapse of social structures. Currently, global society is experiencing similar pressures, especially in the context of over-concentration of population, uneven distribution of resources, and unbalanced economic systems (rich countries, poor people). To some extent, these problems can be reflected on and alleviated through decentralized technical architecture to support a more democratic and inclusive social system.

Decentralization is not only a technological innovation, it is also a profound reflection on today's social structure and political system. Through cryptocurrencies and blockchain, decentralization offers new perspectives on personal freedom, privacy protection, financial inclusion, censorship resistance, and democratic governance. This emerging field coincides with the core values ​​of the civil rights movement while also challenging the imbalances in existing social and economic systems.

Summary: Political attributes and future trends of crypto assets

The birth and development of encrypted assets have demonstrated its unique positive significance in the complex background of global politics and economy. Although the world is still in the turmoil of class and national conflicts, and the political and military situation is full of uncertainty, the trend of civil rights development is irreversible and is reflected on a global scale. In the next four years, progressive civil rights organizations represented by the crypto community are expected to have a profound impact on all aspects of American politics, economy, and culture. Trump returned to power after gaining support from the crypto community, demonstrating that an inclusive system can promote economic prosperity and better benefit the system. As the political pressure on Trump increases, he will become increasingly aware of the importance of the crypto community and may even view it as a key support force.

The unique political attributes of crypto assets are integrating with the trend of civil rights development and gradually becoming an important trend in global economic and social change. Although this process is accompanied by many challenges - such as the arrest of the founder of Silk Road, the sanctions against cryptocurrency mixers, the impact of negative events such as the political and legal trial faced by Trump, assassination plots, and predictions of Musk's persecution - —But its development prospects are still bright. These setbacks are not only a manifestation of the conflict between innovation and traditional systems, but also highlight the potential and necessity of crypto assets in promoting decentralization and civil rights protection.